June 16 Board of Supervisors Meeting?

Here is a recap of what
actually happened during Tuesday’s meeting.

Overall, the meeting focused on county operations, road funding, public safety, housing, and several ongoing state and federal funding issues. While there were no major public hearings or controversial votes, there were several discussions that offered insight into the challenges facing Tuolumne County and the priorities of the current Board.

One notable detail from the meeting was that Anaiah Kirk was absent again. As a result, only four supervisors participated in the discussions and votes throughout the meeting.


Concerns Raised Over Planned Highway 49 Four-Way Stop

One of the more unexpected discussions occurred during Board reports.

Supervisors Steve Griefer, Jaron Brandon, Ryan Campbell, and Mike Holland all expressed concerns about Caltrans’ plans to install a four-way stop at the intersection of Highway 49 and Shaws Flat Road.

According to the discussion, the project is being driven by accident data collected over many years and is moving forward through an expedited safety process. However, several supervisors expressed frustration that local officials were given very little notice and felt there had not been enough communication with the County or the public.

Board members acknowledged that safety improvements are needed at the intersection but questioned whether a four-way stop is the best long-term solution. Alternatives such as a traffic signal or roundabout were discussed as possible future options.

According to Caltrans’ current timeline, installation could occur as early as late July.


Counties Continue to Feel Budget Pressure

Supervisor Campbell provided an update on ongoing discussions between California counties, the Legislature, and the Governor’s office regarding state funding.

Campbell noted that counties continue to face increasing costs associated with state-mandated programs, particularly within Health and Human Services. While counties are required to provide many of these services, funding does not always keep pace with the cost of delivering them.

The discussion highlighted a concern shared by many counties across California: as state and federal budget decisions shift responsibilities downward, local governments are often left trying to absorb the financial impact.


Update on Homeless Encampment Program

During staff reports, the Board received an update on the County’s Encampment Resolution Funding (ERF) program.

County staff reported that 67 individuals have been assisted through the program, exceeding the original goal of serving 50 individuals living in encampments. Of those assisted, 13 have transitioned into permanent housing.

The current round of funding expires September 30, and the County is preparing an application for the next round of competitive state funding. Staff estimated that operational costs for the program currently range between approximately $10,000 and $20,000 per month, depending on how staffing costs are calculated.


Mobile Home Rent Control Changes Approved

The Board approved amendments to the County’s Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance related to Fair Rate of Return hearings.

Most of the discussion centered around questions regarding the use of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Consumer Price Index (CPI) as a benchmark for calculating inflation adjustments.

County staff explained that Tuolumne County does not have its own official CPI measurement and that this regional CPI was selected during previous fair-rate-of-return proceedings based on expert analysis. Supervisors emphasized that the ordinance does not apply Bay Area prices to Tuolumne County residents, but rather uses the CPI as a measurement of annual inflation.

Supervisor Holland recused himself from discussion and voting because he owns a mobile home park. With Supervisor Kirk absent, the ordinance was approved by the remaining three supervisors on a 3-0 vote.


New County Counsel Appointed

The Board unanimously approved the appointment of Walter Wall as Tuolumne County’s next County Counsel.

County Counsel serves as the County’s chief legal advisor, providing legal guidance to the Board of Supervisors, county departments, and various county agencies.

Wall currently serves in Mariposa County and will begin his four-year term on July 1. The Board also approved a waiver allowing him to continue residing outside Tuolumne County while serving in the position.

During discussion, supervisors noted that recruiting experienced county attorneys remains highly competitive throughout California and that hiring a permanent County Counsel will provide greater continuity than relying on outside legal services.


Road Funding Approved

The Board approved the annual SB 1 Road Repair and Accountability Act project list required for Tuolumne County to receive state transportation funding.

Public Works Director Blossom Scott explained that the County expects approximately $3.8 million in annual SB 1 funding during the upcoming fiscal year, along with previously deferred funds, bringing the total available funding to roughly $6.3 million.

Those funds help support road maintenance operations, equipment, rehabilitation projects, and infrastructure improvements throughout the county.

The discussion also highlighted a common frustration among rural counties. While Tuolumne County maintains hundreds of miles of roads, funding formulas often provide significantly less funding than larger urban counties receive despite their smaller road networks.

Specific paving and rehabilitation priorities are expected to return to the Board for future discussion.


Support for 4-H and Youth Programs

Discussion surrounding the University of California Cooperative Extension agreement prompted a broader conversation about 4-H and youth development programs.

A member of the public spoke about the positive impact 4-H had on her life and encouraged continued support for agricultural education programs.

Supervisor Brandon noted that modern 4-H programs extend beyond traditional livestock projects and now include opportunities in robotics, science, leadership development, public speaking, and other educational fields.


The Bigger Picture

While the June 16 meeting did not include major public hearings or controversial land-use decisions, it highlighted several ongoing challenges facing Tuolumne County.

Road funding, housing affordability, homelessness, wildfire preparedness, infrastructure maintenance, and state funding pressures continue to be recurring themes in county government.

Many of these issues will not be solved through a single vote or a single meeting. Instead, they involve years of planning, partnerships, grant funding, and incremental decisions that gradually shape the services available to residents.

As always, my goal is to help residents understand not only what the Board voted on, but also the conversations, priorities, and challenges that influence those decisions.

Next
Next

Who Do They Think They Work For?